Andrew Huberman· PhD
It’s independent of hormone levels after birth.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
It’s independent of hormone levels after birth.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Testosterone exposure in the womb creates a male vs female difference in finger length ratios that is also reflected in peoples reported sexual orientation.
Homosexual men show a “hyper male” pattern.
Exposure to testosterone in utero biases later sexual orientation.
As you'll learn today, the amount of testosterone that a fetus is exposed to while in the mother has a profound impact not only on the ratio of finger lengths, yes, you heard that right, but it also plays a meaningful role in sexual orientation.