Peter Attia· MD
maybe we still don't actually know how bad this virus is unfortunately because we don't know the de nom of testing we don't really know if this virus kills 1% of the people it infects or 0.1 percent of the people it infects
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
maybe we still don't actually know how bad this virus is unfortunately because we don't know the de nom of testing we don't really know if this virus kills 1% of the people it infects or 0.1 percent of the people it infects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.