The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I was feeling his motivation for social connection and I did it and and I got something that was sort of social I got some information but like psychologically I'm missing the like nutritious part of it right so it kind of fakes you out into thinking that it's social connection but it kind kind of doesn't really work and I worry that that's what we're all getting a lot of right now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.