Peter Attia· MD
because remember you can go up to 35 Cycles but if you start with a large amount of nuclear material you'll see it much sooner and in fact even with the coronavirus that's an important feature right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because remember you can go up to 35 Cycles but if you start with a large amount of nuclear material you'll see it much sooner and in fact even with the coronavirus that's an important feature right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you would like it if a lab would report how many cycles were necessary to demonstrate a positive test and in a clinical assay we're going to come to why all of this is relevant in a clinical assay you need to be able to report the number of Cycles because it matters if it was positive after 20 Cycles versus 30 Cycles that's a far greater that's a that's a very big resolution difference in something being present