Paul Saladino· MD
Human studies, both correlative and controlled, are consistent with health benefits conferred by a calorie restricted diet.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Human studies, both correlative and controlled, are consistent with health benefits conferred by a calorie restricted diet.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The calorie studies are the two best controlled studies in humans and there was two of them um there was one that was very short term six months and then there was another was slightly longer term which was two years how many institutions were a part of these two studies three institutions pennington pennington um washington university and then tufts