The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is but it's also the timeline because of the fact that with inhalation it's like a a a bolus that hits you at once so you get a high blood level um with Edibles it's like the time course so I mean it's going to be like 5 nanog per Mill let's say but it would be like that for a long time whereas the 100 nanogram per Mill from smoking is like for 20 minutes and then it starts dropping
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I mean I think most people are probably not aware except by experience positive or negative in some cases about the differences in blood concentration as it relates to number of tokes versus concentration versus edible