The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for some patients we can actually use uh either for example blood serum your blood serum is actually very rich in growth factors and many of those growth factors it turns out empirically are really helpful for people with dry eye
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and those serum tear uh actually can be very helpful for people with with much more advanced or severe hardto control dry eye symptoms