Peter Attia· MD
the years of life gained are somewhere on on the order if you account for smoking of three to five years something like that
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the years of life gained are somewhere on on the order if you account for smoking of three to five years something like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the relative risk of dying of of heart disease in any any given period of time whether it's year five years ten years whatever the study is doing this is 50 lower but obviously not everybody dies of cardiovascular disease people die of other things and so then you have to trans translate that into sort of light years of life gained and typically the years of life gained are somewhere on on on the order if you account for smoking of three to five years something like that