The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when we increase the amount of organic matter in the soil by one percent a hectare don't quote me on this this is give or take I'm freestyling here but these are about the numbers that I read a hectare of land can hold over 20,000 more gallons per hectare for every 1% organic matter in the soil
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
one percent organic matter in the soil has the water holding capacity of roughly 20 000 gallons
for every percent you can get twenty thousand more gallons you mentioned widow pasture at five percent that's a hundred thousand gallons of water an acre that makes them more drought tolerant more drought resistant
for every one percent of organic matter in the soil it can hold one inch of rain in a catastrophic rain event meaning that the flooding and the erosion will be much lower
for every 1% organic matter can hold 27,000 gallons of water which would prevent floods and droughts which it does and creates more resilient farms