The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this is really cool i mean just people know this is what dave is doing he has a cohort of lean mass hyper responders who are being followed longitudinally with sequential cta scans and i can't wait for the results and we'll see i know spencer thinks it's going to be one way and i think it's going to be the other way and dave is kind of impartial he's the impartial observer and i love that we're talking
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.