Andrew Huberman· PhD
And what we took home from that message is you could do either one. If you do them in a healthy way, it would be okay.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And what we took home from that message is you could do either one. If you do them in a healthy way, it would be okay.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I'm starting to learn learn about insulin resistance. I'm starting to learn about genetic predisposition, which is sort of where our conversation started today. Ah, you know, maybe I should be looking at these personal factors, these predisposing factors, so I could help see if somebody was better on one versus another.