The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
When we look at the studies that have been done on low carbon ketogenic in pregnancy almost all of them have been done on mice and rats and in these studies they had these animals consuming less than 0.6 percent of their calories from carbs so we're talking like a pretty significant level of ketosis right and of course they saw some neurological changes that happened in the offspring
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.