The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but we as we tracked the adherence people couldn't adhere to the keto they couldn't maintain that really low level of carb and the really low level of fat and so as you're working through these questions those are the subtle nuances in nutrition that you just said the poor public and I agree looks at so many of these says oh my god you guys can't agree can I go back to the fact that I've actually helped American Diabetes with their guidelines.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.