Peter Attia· MD
Then he admitted he would not know how to properly evaluate the results.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Then he admitted he would not know how to properly evaluate the results.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
"I don't even know what you are talking about".
the number of good physicians out there really great doctors that are working hard taking care of patients frontline physicians family medicine physicians internists who have no idea what it is you know you ask them about it and they look at you as though you've asked them something in a different language
the overwhelming majority of pcps and a heck of a lot of cardiologists have no idea what LP little a is so uh what good does it tell you to get it tested and you show up in your doctor's office he goes who that's nothing don't worry about it
a lot of labs just are not doing the right type of LP little a testing uh LP littlea testing I was shocked to hear it because it's kind of a cheap test but apparently there are third party payers given doctors grief for ordering it