The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Once again, the only study that I've seen where magnesium did have some efficacy was in a study with older adults, I think they were 60 to 80 years old, it may have been exclusively women, now I think about it and they also had insomnia.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So I started looking back into the literature and I've best traced it at least as far as I can tell, to early studies showing that those who are deficient in magnesium also had sleep problems.
We will see pretty pronounced improvements in a bunch of sleep metrics though. That seems to be re and that that's all very objective. Like our sleep technology is incredibly advanced that we use. It's not just um like a consumer wearable. And so we have a ton of metrics we can look at there. And that one seems to be a really clear jumping off point.