The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
your colonoscopy won't be covered at the frequency that we're going to recommend you do it and even if your mography is covered they probably won't cover the MRI or the ultrasound that we're going to recommend because we never recommend mamography and isolation ever um if we're doing a PSA on you and any of our metrics show more care is warranted they're not going to cover the follow-up study like a 4K test or a you know multiparametric MRI unless your PSA is very high
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.