Paul Saladino· MD
the proportion of proteins of animal origin was higher than in recent japanese according to the national nutrition survey in 1989 animal protein accounted for 52.9 of total proteins in the average japanese
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the proportion of proteins of animal origin was higher than in recent japanese according to the national nutrition survey in 1989 animal protein accounted for 52.9 of total proteins in the average japanese
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.