The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we have an eating meat for four six million years plus like I would this be bad for us this as we talked about in the first part of this podcast this is really what made us human the nutrients and meat we know allowed our brains to grow allowed us to thrive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We have 4 million or so years of human, hominid, and pre-hominid evolution. We have a pretty clear anthropological record showing that we ate more meat. And that may have been the spark that improved our nutrition and led to increases in the size of our brains.