The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the food you eat is a information to your genetics signal to your genetics that you are an abundant successful hunter don't signal to your genetics that you are a crappy hunter or that you are mostly a gatherer because that will lead to unhealth and the absence of nutrients will cause problems over the levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
signal to your genetics that you are a successful hunter by eating mostly meat and organs and the least toxic plant foods that i believe is the signal you want to give your genetics