The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
especially in the culture of context in the Western diet when you're eating me it's often times you're having a beard so with burgers eating a lot of fries got the coca-cola with you so again are you detecting the signal of meat already detecting the signal of alcohol sugar and that is not a question that epidemiology scan can detect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
was it the milkshake day that with a hamburger wasn't the french fries lady with the hamburger was the bread a with the hamburger was it the oxidized vegetable oils in the french fries the thing with hamburger was it the fact that we've been told for the last 70 years that meat is bad for us so anyone that eats meat is a rebel they're gonna wear you know their figuratively gonna leather jacket and ride motorcycles around but you know realistically they're more like they smoke more likely to drink less likely to exercise less likely to get in the Sun and less like the new other health behaviors like go to the doctor regularly for checkups
And so it's this is the problem with these observational studies but those are what are reported those are what gets reported by the mainstream media and that shapes people