Paul Saladino· MD
so it's pretty clear that across many metrics you have improvements in human health or at least metrics which would suggest improvements in human health with more meat
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so it's pretty clear that across many metrics you have improvements in human health or at least metrics which would suggest improvements in human health with more meat
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's pretty clear that across many metrics you have improvements in human health or at least metrics which would suggest improvements in human health with more meat
in countries that are richer people are eating more meat and they are growing to be taller and they are having less uh infant mortality