We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
there is just not enough good evidence to say that nitroso compounds polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or heterocyclic amines are actually that harmful for humans in reasonable doses that you would get by eating meat twice a day unless you are eating the most burned charred fried meat on the planet
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.