We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
so what's interesting here is that this is a very fascinating point Ismene inflammatory in humans and I really appreciate that Chris cited perhaps one of the best studies I've seen on this increased lean mean lean red meat doesn't intake does not elevate markers of oxidative stress and inflammation in humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
later in the podcast James tries to just say something as if it's fact C meat causes inflammation but there really are not good studies to suggest that meat causes inflammation this is not true there are many studies to suggest this is in fact not the case in any way shape or form including this one and many others
can say that meat is inflammatory is ludicrous and kind of beyond me because they're only looking at this misleading epidemiology we have to be very careful
so how anyone can say that meat is inflammatory is ludicrous and kind of beyond me because they're only looking at this misleading epidemiology
that long-term consumption of meat leads to inflammation there is not a single interventional study to show that joel that is false
well that's a that's a false statement there is no good evidence for that and I've talked about that in the past