Paul Saladino· MD
"Meat intake is positively correlated with life expectancies..."
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
"Meat intake is positively correlated with life expectancies..."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
stepwise linear regression selected meat intake not carbohydrate crops is one of the significant positive predictors of life expectancies in contrast carbohydrate crops wheat corn things like that showed weak and negative
the title is total meat intake is associated with life expectancy a cross-sectional data analysis of 175 contemporary populations again this is observational it's an association-based study they looked at 175 countries and they found that worldwide bivariate correlation analyses revealed that meat intake is positively correlated with life expectancies this relationship remains significant when influences of caloric intake urbanization obesity education and carbohydrate crops were statistically controlled stepwise linear regression selected meat intake not carbohydrate crops is one of the significant positive predictors of life expectancies in contrast carbohydrate crops wheat corn things like that showed weak and negative