The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you can be straining, and I'm sure physiologically showing a lot of stress, I mean, I'm sure the cortisol is up, and blood pressure's up, heart rate is certainly up. So it's like, as far as the body is concerned, it's stress as far as the eye can see. But you really can be deeply equanimous and at peace, again, because of the frame around it, because of the concepts attached to it, because you know what you're doing, you know why it's happening, and you want it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.