The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um and while [clears throat] that might not be the most important aspect, I think people that would otherwise say, "Oh, well, you know, this meditation stuff sounds kind of kind of out there." No, this is the stuff of biology. It's the absolutely it's the stuff of physics. It's the stuff of chemistry.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.