The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
One study I'd like to emphasize in particular is Jiang et al. J-I-A-N-G. That is a reference you can find on the reveri.com website under Our Research. And the title of this paper is "Brain Activity and Functional Connectivity Associated with Hypnosis," and it was published in the journal Cerebral Cortex.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.