The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, and one of the, I think, conjectures in all of this is that there's so much going on under the hood that we're typically not aware of. You know our lives are moving at such a pace that the information that is transpiring uh is um is occurring at such a rapid rate that we are typically aware of only a small fraction of that. And this is a practice that's inviting you to simply um be aware of that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.