The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's this concept of wordlessness of The Importance of Being in states of wordlessness where we're not reading we're not thinking in complete sentences we're not um taking in sensory information and we under those conditions are able to actually register how we feel about things like we become better tuned to um sense our environment and input when it comes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Yeah, there's something to be said for these states of wordlessness, where you're not constructing things in complete sentences. There's no sensory input like through a phone or through even-- I do listen to podcasts or books
Yeah, there's something to be said for these states of wordlessness, where you're not constructing things in complete sentences. There's no sensory input like through a phone or through even-- I do listen to podcasts or books when I run sometimes the long run. But there's this idea that a lot of learning and creativity is about purging all the noise. And I find that those long runs, they just come out of them just feeling like a bunch of clutter, just got cleared more than I had some insight during the run itself.