The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
mental training and visualization is not a replacement for real world cognitive or motor Behavior again mental training and visualization cannot replace real world execution of cognitive tasks or of motor tasks if you want to learn however mental training and visualization can and has been shown to be effective for greatly enhancing the speed at which you learn and the stability of that learning over time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what is clear is that mental training and visualization is a very effective way to improve real world performance