Andrew Huberman· PhD
What they're doing is they're exiting focus and going back in more quickly, more quickly, more quickly over and over again.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What they're doing is they're exiting focus and going back in more quickly, more quickly, more quickly over and over again.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
A lot of people think that they can focus with laser precision, but actually, what they are better at doing is refocusing more quickly and consistently over time.