The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
where you know as you're were saying we're wondering what they're doing sometimes if they're sitting there and we're just petting them what we're doing is we're sitting there and we're petting them so they give us these wonderful sensory experiences and I think they cause us to be a little bit more present especially when we're kind of interacting with them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.