Peter Attia· MD
some irregularities popped up in their randomization so some people doing post-hoc analyses found hey these numbers don't make sense it's very improbable that these people were all randomly assigned and I believe because it's been awhile since I read the correction that what they identified was that a number those patients were not randomized correctly for example and it wasn't nefarious but it was done through convenience so if you had a husband-wife team in the study they were immediately put on the same diet which by the way is logical that's actually a better study design but you have to then change the two statistics to accommodate for that because you have no longer randomized each of those individuals they would be considered one randomization not two