The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
All right, as I mentioned earlier, melatonin is not cyclic, it's not cycling in babies, it's more phasic. It's being released at a kind of a constant level. And babies tend to be smaller than adults, they are. And so those concentrations of melatonin are very high. As the baby grows, those concentrations per unit volume are going to go down.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
As I mentioned earlier, melatonin is not cyclic. It's not cycling in babies. It's more phasic. It's being released at a constant level. And babies tend to be smaller than adults, they are. And so those concentrations of melatonin are very high.