The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So on that list, I'm saying you need to put more things like character qualities. Are they honest? Are they reliable? Um, can I trust them? Do we have the same kind of vision of the kind of life that we want to lead? Um, you know, where are we aligned on those important things? cuz those things are those are those are sort of hard to bridge those gaps.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.