The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Often a lot of us have had trauma that makes these changes in the brain and then we're thinking all the time, like what would I do if, if there were war, what would I do if there's civil war, if someone bombs us, what will I do if the economy collapses, right? What will I do if somebody gets sick? We're thinking all this future projection that is all coming from a place of fear, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.