The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the therapist can um literally and somatically um show the patient what Auto regulation is like or what coordinated regulation is like and you'll see it on my face face voice gesture you'll see it on my face you'll see it in the tone of my voice you'll see it in my gestures
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
essentially as the therapist is tracking that the the emotional arousal whether it's into hypoarousal and depression or hyperarousal in you know into anxiety the first thing there is to synchronize with that patient so that my physiology is sinking with their physiology
I'm picking up those points where they are shifting into and out of an emotional state I'm synchronizing with that and then ultimately when I'm in sync with that kind of thing then at that point purely implicitly I'm now starting to slow the tone of my voice if I want to reduce that arousal down or I'm up regulating the voice at that point in time I am now interactively regulating