Andrew Huberman· PhD
Specifically, it seems that repeated exposure to something like a drug of abuse or any type of reward that is a really strong reward in a way it can hijack normal functioning of the nucleus cumbent.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Specifically, it seems that repeated exposure to something like a drug of abuse or any type of reward that is a really strong reward in a way it can hijack normal functioning of the nucleus cumbent.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.