The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
These belief effects are not about lying to yourself in these cases, in these experiments as you'll notice that subjects didn't have prior knowledge about grehlin or about the effects of their daily routine on weight loss and blood pressure. So in order for them to work you have to be naive to the information, right? You can't simply lie to yourself and tell yourself what you want to believe and that's important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.