The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Like how can we apply this to different areas? I did a post, it's called the 2% manifesto on my Substack, so I'll link to it um in that link I mentioned. Um and it lists a bunch of different ways. But I think it really is it's just like this mindset shift, like how can I take this thing I have to do and maybe make it a little bit harder and get a benefit?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.