The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Right, I think those are both, speculating, but you have to pass through this sort of like reality shattering, including your sense of self, and one can handle that in one of two ways. You can either completely surrender to it, or you can try to hang on, and if you try to hang on, it's going to be more like a bad trip.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but you you have to pass through this sort of like you know reality shattering including your sense of self and one can handle that in one of two ways you can either completely surrender to it or you can try to hang on and if you try to hang on it's going to be more like a a bad trip