The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
You could try to let me write a paper and like so that and and and yeah, you could do that for a little bit, but it's tiring and it's exhausting to try to get all these people to believe what you know, like and and and so I Yeah, I just it it it it's anti it goes it's anti it goes against to to the word winning and the win surrender, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.