The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Sometimes there are some very obsessional people who just turn out not to be that hypnotizable for and it's not random. they, you know, they tend to be so overcontrolling of thought. They're all busy evaluating rather than experiencing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So um I would say in general that people with OCD are in the less on the less hypnotizable side of the spectrum. They're less likely to allow themselves to engage in any and you know the typical example is the checking with OCD for example.