The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I guess, I think that it's a matter or not of, absolute control but more control, that we need to think of our brain as a tool and our body's signals as tools as well, to help us understand what's going on in the world, what we need, what matters, what's important, what isn't, but also something that can be managed, not simply absorbed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think um that it's a matter not of you know absolute control but more control that that um we need to think of our brain as a tool and and our body signals as tools as well to help us understand um what's going on in the world, what we need, what matters, what's important, what isn't. uh but also something that can be managed not simply you know absorbed and so hypnosis I think is a kind of limiting case where you can push it about as far as we can push it uh in terms of regulating pain is a you know is a good example of that