The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the kid is at 10 at that moment the best thing is to use a tool from the toolbox and not to engage on the Square at that moment until they come down a little bit and they can pick pay attention and they can listen to you
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we usually use um Wagner's um emotional thermometer to measure where the kid is at and it goes from like 0er to 10 or 1 to 10 uh with different levels of stress and and it's good to use something concrete because sometimes we think they are a 10 and they're at five or vice versa