The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when bdnf binds to track B receptors on neurons it does a lot of things it sets off a whole Cascade of things including the insertion of new glutamate receptors so that those neurons become extra sensitive to any input they get so that's one form of change that bdnf can create bdnf can also alter the overall shape of neurons it can cause neurons to grow new branches so that it can receive new inputs from other neurons
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.