The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So I think this this sulpa idea and this idea of like you know focus on being statements because being statements are like more primordial and they will ma they will result in the mental fluctuations of your mind in a different way right so they'll automatically result in a certain kind of desire in a certain kind of planning and a certain kind of inclination they're your most natural tendency
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.