The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was like something had to happen to our system obviously it does something happens to our system that is a little bit of a there's a shock there boom and then a buddy gets killed and then you it's not even always with that then you have extreme firefight or you know close call and then it's just boom boom shock shock shock shock it's almost like getting TBI for the nervous system it's just a constant High it to me it always felt like that constant highend
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.