The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
part of that is the speaking part of it is also the taking turns piece because we're going to be speaking. generally just us speaking, but that really getting into a conversation where I listen to what's coming back forces me to also um practice withholding speech. Because I feel like a lot of bad talks are when people are just kind of fire hosing or they're adding little elements to the sentences where they don't need them
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.