The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And son of a gun, these people really did improve by these questionnaires, by the standards in the field. Uh basically, they improve their markers, >> their mental health. >> Their mental health. Yeah. By the surveys. So that first and that was true for the Byron Katy one. It was true for the Tony Robbins one.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We now have some of the OMIX data back and they're they do seem to improve in their inflammatory markers as well.